Software Asset Management (SAM) is at a pivotal moment. Organizations across industries are grappling with increasingly complex digital ecosystems, while the rapid adoption of SaaS platforms, multi-cloud environments, and decentralized software procurement have created new challenges. IT departments struggle to maintain oversight of software usage, finance teams face escalating and unpredictable costs, and compliance officers must navigate an evolving landscape of audits and regulatory requirements.
What once was a function focused on operational tasks — like tracking licenses and reconciling entitlements — needs to evolve into a strategic practice that governs software use across the organization. The future of SAM lies in governance, and its value extends far beyond compliance, impacting cost optimization, risk mitigation, and overall business efficiency.
Organizations must reimagine SAM not as a reactive measure to avoid audits, but as a proactive tool for driving business efficiency and strategic value. At its core, software governance ensures that companies not only stay compliant but also optimize costs, use resources efficiently, and align technology investments with broader organizational goals.
What challenges do enterprises face, and how are governance and AI transforming the future of SAM?
The software landscape today is more fragmented than ever, driven by the rise of decentralized software procurement, shadow IT, and various subscription-based models.
Organizations are no longer limited to a handful of software vendors, but instead rely on a diverse mix of service providers, cloud platforms, and open-source tools. This complexity makes it challenging to track licenses and compliance, leading to potential financial and legal risks.
The rapid growth of subscription-based software models is transforming enterprise IT strategies. According to analyst Gartner, worldwide SaaS spending is projected to grow by 19.4% in 2025, reaching an impressive $295 billion. Similarly, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is forecasted to see a remarkable growth of 29.1% in 2025, totaling $232 billion. These numbers highlight the accelerating shift toward cloud-based software
and infrastructure, pushing organizations to refine their Software Asset Management (SAM) practices to adapt to this dynamic environment.
Enterprises must navigate multiple licensing agreements with different terms and conditions, which can be difficult to understand and manage. To add to the complexity, many SaaS vendors have subscription-based pricing models that charge per user or device, making it challenging to forecast costs accurately. Additionally, the increasing use of virtual machines and containers adds another layer of complexity for tracking usage rights. As a result, organizations need a comprehensive governance approach to ensure they stay compliant while maximizing operational efficiency and maintaining audit readiness.
Different departments often purchase tools independently, bypassing the IT department, which results in a lack of visibility over the organization’s software portfolio. SaaS platforms, while efficient in certain use cases, have also introduced nuanced licensing structures that make accurate tracking difficult. Add multi-cloud complexities to the mix, and you end up with environments that are increasingly hard to manage.
This fragmentation leads to several major risks. Compliance issues arise, including exposure to audits that could result in penalties or reputational harm. Costs spiral out of control when unused or unnecessary software subscriptions go unnoticed. Resource utilization becomes inefficient, with overlapping tools purchased by multiple teams and underused licenses wasting valuable budget. A striking example of these challenges is NASA, which has faced significant financial losses due to poor Software Asset Management (SAM) practices. According to a report by the Office of Inspector General, the agency paid $20 million in fines and penalties over five years for underlicensed software. Additionally, NASA overspent $15 million on unused Oracle licenses. The report criticizes NASA’s decentralized and inconsistent SAM approach, which increases financial and operational risks. For modern organizations, simply tracking licenses is no longer enough. SAM must evolve to address these broader challenges.
Amidst these fragmented software landscapes, organizations are beginning to recognize the need for SAM to transition from an operational focus to strategic governance. Governance looks beyond compliance. It introduces a systematic approach to defining roles, centralizing processes, and leveraging data for decision-making.
Effective software governance begins with clearly defining roles and responsibilities. While SAM managers are critical, governance requires input from multiple departments, including procurement, finance, IT, and legal. This is where the concept of “federated accountability” comes into play. By distributing responsibility across the organization, accountability becomes shared rather than isolated, ensuring better coordination and less fragmentation.
Another core principle of governance is prioritizing high-quality data collection. A centralized entitlement database becomes the backbone of strategic SAM initiatives, offering transparency into software use, license agreements, and potential optimization opportunities. High-quality data leads to actionable insights, enabling smarter decision-making around software procurement, license renewals, and cloud migrations.
Cross-department collaboration plays a critical role as well, aligning teams on shared objectives and preventing miscommunication. Implementing governance successfully requires breaking silos and fostering a culture of collaboration, where stakeholders understand the larger picture.
To succeed in adopting strategic governance, organizations must tackle one of the most significant bottlenecks in SAM today — a lack of centralization. Enterprises often struggle with siloed data, scattered across contracts, invoices, and departmental systems. The transition toward governance begins with three essential steps.
Ultimately, the future of Software Asset Management lies in governance. Compliance becomes just one element of a much bigger picture, where governance ensures efficient resource allocation, cost savings, and improved organizational alignment. The value of governance is both operational and strategic, giving leaders the tools and insights to elevate SAM—and by extension, the business itself—onto a stronger trajectory.
To stay competitive, organizations must rethink their SAM strategies. Transitioning from license tracking to governance enables businesses to align their technology assets with long-term goals. The opportunity is clear — governance delivers value not only in risk reduction but in enabling strategic growth. The time to act is now. Implement strategic governance practices, leverage AI where appropriate, and drive your organization into the next generation of Software Asset Management.
Do you want to see Software Asset Management in Action? See our recent webinar with tool demos and expert insights